A new survey reveals that public trust in artificial intelligence remains deeply fractured across the United Kingdom, with one in seven citizens expressing fear that personal AI agents could implicate them in illegal activities. Gathered by cybersecurity PR agency Eskenzi PR, the data highlights widespread apprehension regarding autonomous systems and the complex question of legal liability.
While technology companies race to introduce personal AI assistants capable of managing daily schedules, responding to messages, and interacting with applications, ordinary users remain deeply skeptical. According to the findings, 34 percent of the British public would feel uncomfortable giving an AI agent even a modicum of control over their daily lives. On the opposite end of the spectrum, just one in ten respondents indicated a willingness to hand over total control.
Key takeaways
- One in seven Brits fear personal AI agents could lead them into legal trouble.
- 34 percent of respondents are uncomfortable giving AI agents any control over daily life.
- 40 percent believe the company that built the AI agent should bear legal responsibility.
- 36 percent worry about AI agents being hacked or hijacked.
Liability confusion and demographic divides
The fear of breaking the law through automated actions is particularly pronounced among younger demographics. Among adults aged 18 to 24, the proportion of individuals worried that their AI agent might commit an illegal act rises to one in five. Jonathan Armstrong, a partner at Punter Southall, emphasized that public assumptions regarding the legality of automated tools are often misaligned with reality.
"I think it’s important that we have a debate about AI liability — and this survey is important as part of that debate," Armstrong said. He noted that many people mistakenly view AI as a legal wild west, whereas users are typically held responsible for the AI tools they deploy and the resulting consequences, even if unexpected. When asked who should shoulder the blame for rogue AI actions, 40 percent of surveyed Brits pointed to the software designer or creator. Meanwhile, 25 percent believed the third-party service being accessed should take the blame, and only 18 percent felt the individual user should be held accountable.
Security fears and corporate distrust
Beyond legal worries, consumer anxieties extend heavily into cybersecurity and financial safety. Exactly 36 percent of surveyed individuals expressed concern that their AI agents could be hacked or hijacked. Furthermore, 28 percent fear that autonomous agents might mismanage or misspend their money, prompting several banks to issue warnings against sharing banking credentials with automated software.
Corporate deployments of artificial intelligence face similar skepticism. When evaluating banks, insurers, or utility providers utilizing automated decision-making, 37 percent of respondents demanded reassurance that a human would retain final approval power. Additional concerns included transparency over decision boundaries at 31 percent and personal data protection at 24 percent. Driven by these misgivings, one in five consumers would consider switching service providers if AI was integrated into corporate decisions, while 18 percent would hesitate to use secondary products from the same firm.
Comments