Why the Xbox Series S remains significantly cheaper than the Series X

Why the Xbox Series S remains significantly cheaper than the Series X
Share

Nearly six years into its lifecycle, the current hardware generation has defied traditional trends by seeing price increases rather than drops. Component cost pressures, particularly surrounding RAM pricing, have driven up hardware tags across the board for major gaming systems. Even within this climate, the Xbox Series S continues to offer a lower cost of entry compared to the Xbox Series X, matching the Nintendo Switch 2 as one of the most affordable modern gaming consoles available.


The price gap between the two Microsoft systems boils down to distinct hardware architecture. The Xbox Series S is built as a digital-only console, completely omitting a physical disc drive. Under the hood, the performance specs also reflect the price difference. While the Series X packs 12 teraflops of processing power, a higher-clocked custom AMD Zen 2 CPU, and targets 4K resolution, the Series S features 4 teraflops and targets 1440p gaming. Furthermore, the Series X utilizes 16GB of faster RAM and an AMD RDNA 2 GPU with 52 compute units, compared to the Series S's 10GB of RAM and 20 compute units.


Choosing between the two consoles ultimately depends on individual gaming preferences and display setups. Players who rely on digital libraries or services like Game Pass may find the disc-free design of the Series S a non-issue, while also benefiting from a physical footprint roughly 60 percent smaller than the Series X. Performance purists demanding native 4K resolution and physical media compatibility will still lean toward the higher-end console, though buyers eyeing the broader market may also weigh upcoming hardware developments like Microsoft's Project Helix family slated for future developer testing.

Found this helpful? Share it.

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!